Discussion about this post

User's avatar
M.Wilson's avatar

Giving a real irredeemable villain is such a huge win for this series. We've spent too long with the "Wicked" and Loki, "evil is just misunderstood" trope. We need a reminder that there is real genuine evil that cannot and should not be saved or redeemed only destroyed.

Expand full comment
Carefulrogue's avatar

>Irredeemability has been done before, and it's been done quite well. But it's fallen so far to the wayside in recent years that it's refreshing when it finally comes up again.

Anime is very guilty of having "sympathetic" monster races/demons. All over the place I see it, and have watched passable shows where this is the sort of messaging. Maybe the "demon" bit is a slight mistranslation, but it's one that wounds badly when watching generic-fantasy-show-###. I'm sorry, I'm not into fantasy for hippy-dippy pastoral harems where if only everyone sang "Kumbaya" all wars would cease and the Garden restored. I'm in it for the action-adventure-romances. The battles. The clever use of magic and wit. Saving of princesses and the valiant last stands against armies of the night.

>Himmel the Hero was sometimes too kind for his own good. He was too trusting. Too naive. He was once asked to slay this demon. <image>But he hesitated.

There was a long con in this arc. This demon fooled me, in so far as my gut reaction warred with what I legitimately didn't yet known. Was there other variables in play? I was under the impression it was maybe a week or so before the demon committed it's atrocity against the mayor. But in either case... they were tricked, and it resulted in more deaths.

The con in the arc deals with a very human thing. Can we trust what received wisdom we have inherited... or could it be flawed in some fashion? As it turns out, the dogma is correct. Demons are to be killed whenever found, if possible.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts